sans title

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

I started writing this to respond to someone, but it became too big for a comment, so I am sticking it here ...

Eating is an animalistic act, and so is sex. We took these animalistic acts, and attempted to humanize them. We succeeded pretty well with eating, we put our minds to good use and came up with novel cooking techniques, new concoctions and recipes, and what not. But we failed miserably when it came to sex. We can think, and we have an ego. This makes us possessive,jealous and insecure by nature. We thought and thought and constructed elaborate social structures and rituals around sex. Societies made rules and instituions to preclude all possibilities of no-strings-attached, purely-for-pleasure sex. We made the act as mysterious as we possibly could. This has landed us in a big unhappy mess. I am not exaggerating when I say that it has been the cause of numerous wars and crimes, and a lot of misery as a result. That is why I said we would be much better without it. Once again, I am not against the act of sex or the pleasure that individuals derive from it, but sex in its present convoluted form, as it exists in human societies today. Unfortunately, we can't go back to being simple. We cannot selectively backtrack. No, you can't enjoy the boons of the civilization and human thinking but say "I want out" when faced with the banes.

Now, let me put my speculative hat on. Perhaps, this is what the nature had ordained for us. Perhaps, sex was supposed to play a limited role in aiding the evolution by letting humans reach a critical mass in terms of population and creativity, and after that critical mass is reached, the act of sex would have had to go. Because population management by natural procreation is exponential and uncontrolled, and we needed that uncontrolled growth to reach the critical mass. Perhaps, we are very near that critical mass, and the next step in evolution is when humans don't feel the urge to have sex, so that humans don't procreate naturally, because the nature wants technologically controlled growth after reaching the critical mass .... not a very comforting thought, but possible. If you've read Ray Kurzweil (in The Singularity Is Near : When Humans Transcend Biology), you will understand what I am talking about.

Tuesday, December 27, 2005

Ho ho ho, ha ha ha.. why am I so evil ?


That was seriously not my intention...

Saturday, December 24, 2005

"If people bring so much courage to this world the world has to kill them to break them, so of course it kills them. The world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be sure it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry."